Saturday, May 18, 2013

Indian circuses struggle to adapt after court bans

In this April 11, 2013 photo, Biju Nair, principal clown at Rambo Circus, looks at a mirror before a performance on the outskirts of Mumbai, India. Nair who literally ran away and joined the circus at the age of 10 says he scours YouTube for videos of international clowning acts to give him new ideas with help from other performers who know how to read and write, since he never learned. Circuses around the world may struggle to compete with an ever-increasing array of entertainment options, but India?s once-widespread industry in particular has gone through cataclysmic changes. (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

In this April 11, 2013 photo, Biju Nair, principal clown at Rambo Circus, looks at a mirror before a performance on the outskirts of Mumbai, India. Nair who literally ran away and joined the circus at the age of 10 says he scours YouTube for videos of international clowning acts to give him new ideas with help from other performers who know how to read and write, since he never learned. Circuses around the world may struggle to compete with an ever-increasing array of entertainment options, but India?s once-widespread industry in particular has gone through cataclysmic changes. (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

In this April 11, 2013 photo, a circus artist wears a Spiderman costume before a performance at the Rambo Circus on the outskirts of Mumbai, India. Circuses around the world may struggle to compete with an ever-increasing array of entertainment options, but India?s once-widespread industry in particular has gone through cataclysmic changes. In the 1990s, there were 300 circuses operating throughout the country. That number has now dwindled to about 30, says circus manager John Matthew, and many of those are in financial trouble due to rising costs of renting field space, shrinking revenues and - crucially - two Supreme Court rulings that took away two of the industry?s main attractions. (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

MUMBAI, India (AP) ? In the early morning heat and dust, daily practice at the Rambo Circus is in full swing. A trapeze creaks as two performers perfect their throws. A Colombian daredevil shouts to his colleagues scrambling atop a giant set of spinning wheels called the Ring of Death.

Looking on with worry is circus manager John Matthew. For 38 years, he has been in the business of entertaining people throughout southern India. But there's little to smile about these days. The big top set up in a desolate field outside Mumbai seats 3,000 people. Recently, there have been less than 100 tickets sold.

While circuses in other countries struggle to compete with an ever-increasing array of entertainment options, India's have faced a cataclysm.

In the 1990s, 300 circuses operated throughout the country. That number has dwindled to about 30, says Matthew. And many of those are being hammered by the rising rents for field space, shrinking revenues and ? crucially ? two Supreme Court rulings that took away the industry's main attractions.

"After 10 or 15 more years, there may not be any circus at all in India," Matthew says, sitting at a folding table outside the canvas tent he uses as both office and living quarters.

Circuses once held legendary status in India as entertainment for everyone from princes to pariahs. The biggest names pitched their tents in town centers, drawing huge crowds night after night. The modern circus here is a 130-year-old tradition that according to local lore began when a southern rajah's horse trainer was taunted by the leader of a visiting Italian show, who said India couldn't build its own circus. The trainer, Vishnupant Chartre, founded The Great Indian Circus within months, spawning a national love affair with clowns, wild animal acts and death-defying feats.

In the 1990s, India's Supreme Court banned the use of wild animals in circuses, citing widespread neglect of lions, bears, monkeys and panthers. Then, two years ago, it banned child performers.

"There are instances of sexual abuse on a daily basis, physical abuse as well as emotional abuse. The children are deprived of basic needs of food and water," the activist group Bachpan Bachao Andolan said in the lawsuit charging exploitation of young children that led to the ban.

Matthew, however, disagrees with both court bans. He remembers fondly his early days in the circus when there was a menagerie of trained tigers, elephants and other exotic animals that were the main draw for audiences.

"We loved our animals, and our business depended on them. So we took good care of them," he insists. Now, the circus only has four elephants, and Matthew says the Ministry of Environment is considering taking them away too.

As for child labor, he says, circuses used to give a skill and livelihood to poor children unable to go school.

Biju Nair was once one of those children. At age 10, he literally ran away and joined the circus.

Fleeing an abusive home, he stowed away on a train to Mumbai ? then called Bombay ? and wandered the streets. Hungry and desperate, he wandered into a circus and was given a plateful of food and a job as a ticket taker. In his teens, he used to sneak into the tent to watch the performance, particularly fascinated by the clown acts. Eventually, he persuaded the clowns to teach him their trade.

Now 42, Nair is the principal clown at Rambo Circus, a job he takes pride in. He says he scours YouTube for videos of international clowning acts to give him new ideas with help from other performers who know how to read and write, since he never learned.

"It's a hard life in many ways, yes, but it gave me a chance," he says. "And there is a good feeling in making people laugh."

Still, he is glad his two children, who live with his late wife's parents in Kerala, are getting an education in school, instead the circus.

Nair, too, doesn't see much of a future for circuses in India now that child apprenticeships are banned. Skills like acrobatics and tightrope walking have to be taught young, he says, but there are no students anymore.

"You don't just wake up at 20 and learn to do these things," he says.

With a shortage of homegrown performers, Indian circuses have turned to foreign acts. That's how the three Colombian performers and their Ring of Death come to the Rambo Circus

In the midday lull between practice and the afternoon's performance, 26-year-old Colombian Jhean Carlos lounges in the plywood cubicle the travelling crew builds for him each time they set up camp. The generator-powered air conditioner signifies his status as the star of the show.

The Colombians mostly keep to themselves, because they speak only Spanish. When the staff really needs to communicate with them, they use a computer translation program.

Carlos says he's a fourth-generation circus performer, and in his home country, such performers have benefits and insurance against injury and illness. That impresses Nair, who makes just 8,000 rupees ($150) per month with no benefits other than housing in a shared canvas tent. But Nair and most Indian performers say Rambo is one of the better circuses in India.

Three months ago, the circus added an Ethiopian acrobatic troupe.

Girma Yidnekachew, who learned tumbling and contortion at a charity school for Ethiopian street children, says his country has an oversupply of performers and a shortage of circuses. He answered an Internet ad and came to India with some acrobat friends. Here he makes $600 per month

"It's not the money," says Yidnekachew, 23. "I like being inside the ring. It makes people happy."

In addition to the expense of importing acts, Matthew has to contend with rising rent for the land to set up his big top and camp.

Indian academic Nisha Poyyarath Rayaroth, who studied circus culture for her doctorate at the University of Delhi, says circuses she visited all complained about access to land. The central government once instructed cities to accommodate travelling entertainers, but that support ended in the 1990s.

"Nowadays in many major cities, for example, New Delhi, circuses have to set up shop in grounds in the outliers of the city, without sufficient facilities," Rayaroth says. Those locations also limit audiences.

At Rambo Circus' temporary home, a 1 p.m. performance is cancelled because of poor ticket sales, but the 4 p.m. show has an audience of about 250, mostly parents with young children.

The show leads with the Ring of Death, with Carlos leaping in and out of the spinning rings. The Ethiopians come out dancing to an African beat, tumbling and contorting as the audience claps along in rhythm.

Biju the clown is a crowd-pleaser with his repertoire of pratfalls and fart jokes and a roundup inviting all the audience's children to jump rope with him. The show winds up with the trapeze act, and the audience gasps and applauds.

As the crowd files out, Matthew allows himself a small smile.

For now, at least, his circus is defying death.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-05-17-India-Struggling%20Circus/id-eac269d863a7427ca22327bad004a5ae

the river dr dog ke$ha earl csco big bend national park leon russell

Column: Washington-gate

By David Rohde

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Unprecedented Justice Department searches of journalists' phone records. IRS targeting of conservative political groups. Spiraling sexual assault rates in the U.S. military. And the downplaying of the first killing of an American ambassador in 30 years.

In a matter of days, alarming accounts have emerged regarding the actions of five key U.S. federal government bureaucracies: the Justice Department, the Internal Revenue Service, the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon.

For commentators on the right, the reports are final proof of the raft of conspiracy theories focused on President Barack Obama. For commentators on left, they are non-scandals that Republicans exaggerate for political gain. Obama is either the devil or Obama is an angel. Our endless left-right debate misses more serious problems.

For liberals, the reports are a worrying sign of Obama's struggles to carry out his second-term agenda. For conservatives, they show that even if a Republican wins the White House, Washington is increasing unmanageable.

First, Obama's woes. Some of his wounds are self-inflicted. For five years the Obama administration has displayed a destructive tendency to try to have it both ways. In a press conference Thursday, the president did so again.

In lawyerly responses, Obama said he supported journalists' constitutional right to report but stood by the fact that his administration has carried out more criminal leak investigations than all previous administrations combined. He called for the ouster of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad but prevaricated on how the United States would respond to apparent Syrian government chemical weapons attacks.

Obama came into office promising openness. But from counter-terrorism to domestic policy, his White House has been secretive, insular and controlling. Yes, Republicans are bent on destroying Obama's presidency, but an aloof president has alienated his Democratic allies.

Congress is no better. Each two-year term seems to set new standards for political trench warfare. One-third of the committees in the Republican-controlled House are investigating the administration. Some on the far right call for Obama's impeachment.

During President George W. Bush's second term, a similar pattern emerged. Representative Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) carried out exhaustive hearings on the administration's misdeeds in Iraq. And some talked of impeaching Bush. The current Republican effort is broader than the Democratic one. But the goal is the same: Smear one's opponent first, legislate second.

Smear is the operative word as well in an increasingly partisan news media. Commentators on Fox and MSNBC earn millions oversimplifying complex problems, denigrating their political opponents and pandering to the far right and far left. Fox has been consistently worse.

After months of pedaling Benghazi conspiracy theories, Fox's Sean Hannity declared this week that the IRS was targeting "those that desire to make America a better place to live." Roger Ailes and company look likely to again overplay their hand and, unintentionally, help Obama.

The IRS actions, from targeting conservative tax-exempt organizations to lying to members of Congress, were outrageous. But so far, no evidence has emerged that the White House knew of the effort. And responsibility for the soaring number of sexual assaults in the military lies primarily with Pentagon, not the White House.

But both scandals show a larger problem. Legislative deadlock makes governance more difficult. Ambiguous regulations have complicated the IRS's job of screening political groups. And there is limited agreement in Congress on how to reform the military's antiquated system for prosecuting sexual assault.

Regarding Benghazi, there are some criticisms that can and should be made of the administration. Locked in a fiercely contested re-election campaign, Obama downplayed the role of al Qaeda in the attack in his initial public statements.

But Republicans exaggerate the impact of the careful terminology Obama used. At most, the effort succeeded for several weeks. By Election Day, the fact that al Qaeda-linked terrorists had killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans was well known.

Far-right claims that Obama or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton personally blocked aid to Benghazi before or during the attack are baseless and absurd. Neither would want an American ambassador killed in the middle of a presidential campaign.

Instead, blame for Benghazi lies across the government.

House Republicans' rejection of $450 million in State Department requests for additional security funding since 2010 intensified the department's dependence on private contractors to guard its facilities. When the Libyan government banned such firms, the department's understaffed Diplomatic Security Service had only a handful of personnel to deploy in Libya. Charlene Lamb and three other State Department officials were relieved of their duties after rejecting repeated requests for additional security from American officials in Libya.

Privately, career diplomats have also questioned Stevens' decision-making. They expressed surprise at his choice to spend the nights of September 10 and 11 in Benghazi, which had already experienced a series of anti-Western attacks. Brief, unpredictable day visits make it more difficult for attackers to plan assaults, they said.

And as Jake Tapper correctly pointed out in a May 15 piece for CNN, the Benghazi facility was, in fact, primarily a CIA outpost. Of the roughly 30 people evacuated from the site, 20 were CIA employees. State Department officials had an informal arrangement with the CIA to provide security if needed. When the attack unfolded, both the CIA and military were unprepared.

The 100 pages of emails released by the White House on Wednesday raise more questions for Clinton than for Obama. The State Department, not the White House, mounted an intensive effort to eliminate references to al Qaeda from much-disputed talking points. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, for example, should disclose who she was referring to when she cited the concerns of her "building leadership."

In the weeks ahead, perceptions of Obama will likely harden. The right will see him as dastardly. The left will view him as a victim of Washington's gutter politics. Most probably, his biggest sin is being aloof and disengaged.

But Obama's failings are only part of the problem. An increasingly polarized Washington is devouring its own. Ceaseless, take-no-prisoners political warfare, not nefarious White House plots, ravages government.

(David Rohde is a Reuters columnist but his opinions are his own.)

(David Rohde is a columnist for Reuters, two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize and a former reporter for The New York Times. His latest book, "Beyond War: Reimagining American Influence in a New Middle East," was published in April.)

(David Rohde)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/column-washington-gate-135919235.html

independence day BET Awards 2012 declaration of independence 4th Of July 2012 Zach Parise Spain Vs Italy Euro 2012 Pepco

Google Now Introduces Mark Up Tools For Select Partners To Flag Flights, Hotel Stays And Reservations In Emails

google-now-stuffGoogle made a relatively quiet announcement today regarding how it's pushing the developer ecosystem forward around Google Now, its intelligent personal assistant for Android devices. The company has begun extending mark up tools for emails from select partners, which help highlight flight schedules, hotel bookings and various types of reservations, to make sure that Gmail can spot that information and use it to auto-generate helpful reminders in Google Now.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/TlTpS4qYDV0/

jason varitek andrew breitbart dead sheriff joe arpaio limbaugh aaron smith wilt chamberlain joe arpaio

Friday, May 17, 2013

U.S. Senate confirms Ernest Moniz as Energy Secretary

TREVISO, Italy, May 16 (Reuters) - Britain's Mark Cavendish won stage 12 of the Giro d'Italia, his third victory of the 2013 race while compatriot and Tour de France winner Bradley Wiggins lost time on the overall contenders. Second in the bunch sprint in the rain soaked stage was France's Nacer Bouhanni, with Slovenian Luka Mezgec in third. Italy's Vincenzo Nibali remains the race's overall leader, Wiggins, previously fourth, lost contact with the main group in the final hour and lost an estimated three minutes. The Giro d'Italia finishes on May 26 in Brescia. (Editing by Pritha Sarkar)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-senate-confirms-ernest-moniz-energy-secretary-183623171.html

ides of march pi higgs boson reggie bush pope Chris Cline New Pope

Why Google Didn't Talk About Glass Yesterday

Remember last year's I/O keynote and all the skydiving and bike riding shenanigans Google pulled? That was fun! Not to mention the big reveal: Google Glass. But if you managed to stay awake during yesterday's three hour keynote, you probably noticed that Glass was noticeably absent. What's up with that?

The answer's surprisingly simple: Glass isn't ready. For all the hype the media?and Google itself?has drummed up over the last few weeks, it's still a beta product. It's still in development, and isn't readily available to consumers or developers. However much we think of it as a product, it's still not much more than an experiment.

Accordingly, says a source at Google, the company is heads down ironing out the bugs. Unlike other Google products that have fallen by the wayside or been killed off altogether, Glass wasn't included in the keynote because, well, we don't yet live in a world where Glass is a thing. There's plenty going on with Glass, it's just all happening behind closed doors where hundreds?maybe even thousands?of developers are trying to figure out what to do with Glass.

Even today, Google has four dedicated sessions for Glass developers at I/O, and that speaks volumes about how Google is approaching this new wearable. Even before the Explorer Editions began shipping, Google held two hackathons in New York and San Francisco. At the "Glass Foundry" events, developers were shown the Mirror API and what the company had accomplished up until that point.

During that first session a handful of new apps?what Google calls Glassware?were announced. Google also mentioned today that a new Glass Development Kit (GDK) would be coming soon to make the process of developing for Glass easier, as well as adding new functions like an offline mode. Yes, either of those could have easily been a talking point during yesterday's keynote. But the number of people Glassware directly affects measures in the low thousands. Advances in Google's maps, search, and image products impact the lives of billions.

While Larry Page stumbled through yesterday's Q&A after his closing speech and essentially avoiding any question about Glass, he did manage to reiterate that Glass was a "new category" and that it was "quite different" than existing computing devices and that the end goal is have happy users.

Google is clearly putting a lot of effort and money towards the development of Glass. But its absence during the keynote shouldn't raise any flags. At most it should cause us to shift our perception of a product that's still more promise than substance. It's a fundamental shift in Google's DNA from a company that just makes money off of ads to a company that's really thinking about the future. Sure, the ad money is what's allowing them to even work on projects like Glass and drive-less cars, but it's a means to an end. And the end could be something spectacular.

Source: http://gizmodo.com/why-google-didnt-talk-about-glass-yesterday-507648344

texas rangers steve jobs meningitis bobby valentine bobby valentine miguel cabrera Karrueche Tran

Foc.us headset claims to shock the brain for better gaming, we go forehead-on

Focus headset stimulates your brain, hones in on gaming foreheadon

We've seen a number of headsets tap into the mind, to geotag your mood, grant you remote control over gadgets or simply let you wiggle a pair of cat ears. None of those are quite like the foc.us, however, which serves up transcranial direct-current simulation (tDCS) -- a controversial form of neurosimulation that transmits current to a particular area of the brain. Originally used to help patients with brain injuries, tDCS has supposedly been found to increase cognitive performance in healthy adults. These claims haven't been proven yet though, and shocking your own cranium isn't exactly FDA approved.

Still, the foc.us is one of a few tDCS headsets designed for the consumer market and can, the inventor Michael Oxley claims, improve your working or short-term memory when the electrodes are placed on your prefrontal cortex. A low-intensity current is passed through the different nodes, exciting that part of the brain. Interestingly, Oxley is positioning it as a way to boost your video gaming prowess for the "ultimate gaming experience," a concept we found a little odd. That said, you don't actually have to wear the headset while shooting up bad guys or other brain-draining tasks. The idea behind the foc.us headset is to put it on your noggin, fire it up, and wait for around five to ten minutes, then take it off and go about your day. We did just that and all the gory details are after the break.

Gallery: foc.us

Filed under:

Comments

Source: foc.us

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/17/focus-headset-tdcs/?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget

king arthur king arthur there will be blood there will be blood nigel barker secret service fenway park

Death By Lens Flare: Drink Into Darkness

The latest installment of Star Trek warps into theaters this weekend, compressing decades of canon into an action-oriented thrill ride. Regardless of whether or not you like what J.J. Abrams has done with the franchise, he has left an indelible lens-flared mark on it. Among Trekkies like myself, there is a game going around capitalizing on Abrams? flare for flare.

Let?s play Drink Into Darkness.

Lens flare typically occurs when you film an intense light source, and some of that light reflects and ricochets off the imperfections of the camera lens. It?s easy to create when shooting something like the Sun, but you can also induce it artificially with extra lights and mirrors. Abrams admits that he used extra flashlights and mirrors to create the numerous flares in 2009?s Star Trek. In fact, he used this technique so many times that he created his own meme.

To play the game, get to your local theater and surreptitiously bring in your favorite drink. We are going to take a sip every time we see a lens flare. If the 2009 movie was any indication, you are going to have a lot of fun playing Drink Into Darkness, or die.

Set Phasers to Stun

Now, I assume that anyone who chooses to play this game will drink responsibly, but what if you didn?t? What if a person actually took a sip of alcohol every time they saw a lens flare in Star Trek Into Darkness, as per the game stumbling around social media?

First, we have to assume a few variables. As alcohol content and body weight play huge roles in determining how drunk you get, I?ll use average US male and female weights, as well as an average beverage with 12% alcohol by volume (like wine). We?ll be conservative and only take a sip (a teaspoon) each time we see a flare. Next, we need the number of lens flares. One intrepid Trekkie counted 1,013 lens flares in the first film, so we?ll go by that standard (others have counted less, but let?s party). Lastly, it depends how fast you play the game, so we?ll assume you start at the beginning of Darkness and stop 127 minutes later.

With so many lens flares, you are going to get wasted, but we have to calculate just how wasted. Using our variables, we can plug them into the formula that the American Prosecutors Research Institute uses to determine blood alcohol content (BAC) in DUI cases.

Laying it all out over the course of the film, you get a graph that looks like this:

With so many lens flares, you?d be sipping on your drink about eight times per minute. At this rate, neither men nor women would make it out alive. But because body weight plays a big role in BAC, men would at least make it past the first act before their breathing fails. Men make it 85 minutes before trekking into darkness while women only make it about half that. That?s what happens when you beam over five liters of alcohol into your system.

People have made it past the 0.5% BAC cut-off that I used here?some even past 1%. But the 0.5% rule holds generally; if you don?t die outright you will probably be poisoned.

Of course, I am assuming a constant stream of flares, a certain kind of beverage, and that you are dumb enough to keep drinking even when you can?t feel feelings anymore. You could always just stop in the safe range, but then you still have a lot of ?not the Star Trek I know and love? to get through.

If you are dead-set on playing Drink Into Darkness, a Trekkie who wants to get tanked, you will end up a literal die-hard fan.

Image Credit:

Screenshot of a beaten-up Kirk from the Memory-Alpha Wiki, Graph by me.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=0e8c07b47c495e14cea016daffbd9340

alex smith The Bible History Channel Melissa King Heat Harlem Shake mediterranean diet chase kim kardashian pregnant